The Billboard Effect

About this Episode


Chris Anderson, Assistant Professor at Cornell University shares the results of a research study “The Billboard Effect” conducted in partnership with JHM Hotels and Expedia. In the study, four properties were cycled on and off Expedia over a period of three months.

Here’s what you will learn in this episode:

- Hotel placement on Expedia results in a 20% increase in bookings on other channels
- Reservations made on other channels (call center, brand.com, other sites) offset reservations made on OTAs
- Rates attained while being listed on Expedia were about 2-3% higher

The bottom line: Hoteliers need to think of OTAs as marketing vehicles versus reservation engines.



11 Comments

  1. bellasum
    Posted March 9, 2010 at 12:17 pm | Permalink

    You have quickly thought up such matchless answer? Wanna joke?) What do you call a nun who walks in her sleep? A roaming Catholic. http://edcilaisusa.977mb.com/images/top.gif 1]vigera purchase online 1]viagara online 1]vigra generica

  2. Ronnie
    Posted January 19, 2010 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    That was a fascinating to hear. Yes I too agree that if a hotelier never fills his bedroom stock to 100% and any contribution to fullfilling that would be a bonus. On top of that if you consider the expense as amarketing one then the ROI is almost 100%.

    It basically is the way one views them and as hoteliers are all passionatiote creatures i can see why we get worked up. Well done Chris. Excellent!!!!!

  3. David
    Posted January 17, 2010 at 3:34 am | Permalink

    Chris… thanks for your time and efforts in conducting this study. Several great points were mentioned. Yes, Expedia and other OTA’s are marketing vehicles and the companies spend a lot of resources on their marketing efforts.
    However, from a hotelier’s perspective, it becomes matter of ROI – can we generate the same demand at a lesser cost through Facebook, Twitter, our own website, etc.
    The commissions are hefty however, OTA’s can be a good way to fill need periods because of the exposure a hotel can enjoy by being listed.
    In essence, OTA’s should be a part of the marketing and revenue management equation, perhaps more for smaller, independent hotels, less for chain hotels.

  4. Phyllis
    Posted January 12, 2010 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    This was an interesting study and I am not surprised at the results. My hotels does participate with OTA’s but that has not always been the case. At one time our market was different and I felt it would simply displace revenue.
    That has been about 3 years ago. Our market became saturated with new condo inventory and the bottom line is if your competition is there, you can not afford to not be. Especially today.

    Challenges still remain when I am one of the only branded hotels in this area and I have more pricing restrictions, etc than comp set I am up against but if the guest does not see you on the shelf, they can not buy your product.

  5. Bill
    Posted January 12, 2010 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    I’ve seen for some time that Expedia is a convenient way to shop options in a market beyond price. Looking for positive impact and measuring it is refreshing. I don’t find a zero sum game. Meeting & exceeding peoples expectations increases the size of demand.
    I’d be interested in feedback from the folks that don’t use Expedia on what they are doing alternately for their marketing. Probably includes quality content if they are successful.

  6. Ash
    Posted January 12, 2010 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    Its about time Hotels recognize the strength and ability of Expedia to market its properties. I personally do not have the budget to match their capabilities or to compete with them. Using them to market my hotel is an excellant investment that we have been linked with for the past few years. Chris excellant study and observations.

  7. joe
    Posted January 12, 2010 at 10:15 am | Permalink

    Chris this is excellent data and has been a strategy of Vizergy for over 8 years, I am glad you have taken the time to provide evidence that this should always be part of the online marketing mix! Many people believe that if you have a website, all is well. This build-it-and-they-will-come approach just doesn’t work. Hotels need professional marketing plans that are going to not only foster solid relationships with existing customers, but also garner new ones.

    Joe Hyman

  8. Chuck
    Posted January 12, 2010 at 9:58 am | Permalink

    Good presentation, I often gripe about paying revenue dollars for an OTA when the hotelier is doing the majority of work… however, in context as marketing vehicle, it seems logical. We are a small Mom and Pop Inn with huge seasonal demand, and even though I routinely question OTA expense, during the shoulder seasons when demand is very competitive, it makes sense.

  9. Ciaran
    Posted January 12, 2010 at 8:32 am | Permalink

    very interesting interview, we also find similar results for meeting room bookings through http://www.meetingsbooker.com with many users booking direct with the hotels after viewing prices on our site.

    Do you plan to hold any interviews around the online marketing of meeting space?

  10. Margherita
    Posted January 12, 2010 at 8:27 am | Permalink

    Thank you for covering a theme I asked for some months ago. In my tourism marketing blog (www.bookingblog.com) in Italian, we analysed the same study and hoteliers were actually very interested in it!

    • Josh
      Posted March 3, 2010 at 7:55 pm | Permalink

      Sure, the OTAs offer marketing value beyond their associated sales, but OTAs also cost more than they appear to cost. Hotels that are willing to consistently rely on OTAs not only outsource their reservations sales, they forego building their brand.

      I worry that we hoteliers are so willing to 1.) get the quick sale and 2.) dismiss exorbitant commissions as a marketing expense that we sacrifice our own brand to build Expedia’s/Travelocity’s/Orbitz’s brands for them. Are you willing to turn your hotel inventory into a commodity to brokered out by the OTAs?

      As GM of an independent hotel I don’t like the idea of paying the crazy commissions that the OTAs demand, but I really HATE the idea that I’m helping shape travelers booking habits. It’s bad enough that I pay that huge commission once, but if a traveler becomes a repeat guest and they rely on the OTAs to book I’ve lost a huge chunk of profit each booking.

      In a perfect world we hoteliers would build our own brands, promote them well and book our own reservations effectively without needing the OTAs at all. If we were all willing to do this instead of taking the easy way, the OTAs could not get away with gouging us. Remember, the big brands have enough brand equity that they don’t really need the OTAs (and they pay far lower rates to the OTAs as a result). The rest of us get to make up the difference.

5 Trackbacks

  1. By the billboard - StartTags.com on January 28, 2010 at 4:41 am

    [...] billboard @ StartTags The Billboard Effect | VTV Channel – A Vlog focusing on Hotel …Chris Anderson, Assistant Professor at Cornell University shares the results of a research study The [...]

  2. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Eric Goldreyer, shawndesouza, VFMLeonardo, Booking Blog™, Booking Blog™ and others. Booking Blog™ said: The Billboard Effect, video-interview to Chris Anderson-Cornell University http://tinyurl.com/y9xhjjp (via @vfmleonardo) [...]

  3. By Twitted by VFMLeonardo on January 12, 2010 at 11:59 am

    [...] This post was Twitted by VFMLeonardo [...]

  4. [...] Anderson shares the results of a research study “The Billboard Effect” conducted in partnership with JHM Hotels and Expedia in which four properties were cycled on and [...]

  5. By uberVU - social comments on January 12, 2010 at 9:18 am

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by RevParGuru_Inc: The Billboard Effect | VTV Channel – A Vlog focusing on Hotel …: STR Report: hotels not listed haven’t se.. http://bit.ly/4ZgNlo...

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>